Missing Masterpieces

Evaluation

Students will be evaluated on the following criteria listed below. This is a group assignment and each group will be graded based on the mastery of 4 separate areas:

Completed Tasks Excellent
(25 -20 A)
Very Good
(19 -15 B)
Average
(14 -10 C)
Below Average
(9 -5 D)
Poor
(4 -0 F)
Total Points Earned Possible
Investigation forms Students exhibited excellent data gathering skills and provided complete details and descriptions using their own words.
Students exhibited good data gathering skills and provided accurate descriptions, written using good grammar and their own words.
Students exhibited functional data gathering skills and provided average descriptions with minimal details. Students exhibited below average data gathering skills and provided poor descriptions without all required information. Students exhibited poor data gathering skills with incomplete descriptions and few details. 25
Travel Mileage Forms Students provided thorough and accurate information, illustrating map routes clearly and using labels, legends and titles in a graphically pleasing format. Students provided thorough and accurate information, illustrating most routes clearly and using proper labeling and legends. Students provided most of the required information, with some errors in calculations, map routes, labeling, and/or legends Students provided little of the required information with some errors in illustrations, calculations or legends. Students provided minimal information, with few map routes, calculations, labels, or legends. 25
PowerPoint Portfolio Presentation showed high technical quality and accurate titles for all paintings, with few if any grammar or spelling errors. Presentation showed good technical quality and accurate titles for most paintings, with some grammar and spelling errors. Presentation showed average technical quality and accurate titles for some paintings, with some grammar and spelling errors. Presentation showed below average technical quality and lacked some required information, with many grammar and spelling errors. Presentation showed poor quality technical qualityand lacked most required information, with many spelling and grammar errors. 25
Teamwork Group members worked exceptionally well as a team, dividing tasks between all members and helping the team to succeed. Group members worked very well together, and completed most of the individual tasks. Group members worked together, were sometimes respectful of one another, and completed most of the individual tasks. Group members worked together some of the time, but did not complete all of the individual tasks. Group members worked poorly together as a team, were not respectful of one another and completed few of the individual tasks. 25
Total           100